IELTS Writing Task

Sample Answer

Band 7+ 

17. Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 

Sample Answer 1 


             Government funding for transport infrastructure is a subject of debate, with some arguing that money should be spent on railways rather than roads. This essay will examine both viewpoints and present my own perspective.

                 The proponents of investing in railroads assert that they offer numerous advantages over automobiles. First, railways have the capacity to convey a greater number of passengers and products than roads, thereby reducing congestion and improving transportation efficiency. Second, railroads are generally regarded as safer and more dependable than automobiles, which can contribute to passenger safety. Investing in railways can also benefit the environment by reducing carbon emissions and fostering sustainable transport options.

   Alternatively, proponents of investment in roads contend that they are more adaptable and accessible. Roads offer greater flexibility in terms of connecting remote locations and accommodating a variety of vehicle types, including automobiles, buses, and trucks. In addition, road infrastructure can be more cost-effective in certain regions, particularly those with low population density or geographical constraints that make railway construction difficult.

                I believe a balanced approach is required. The decision to invest in railways or roads should be founded on each region's unique needs and circumstances. In densely populated urban areas with existing congestion problems, it may be more effective to prioritise railways. In rural or sparsely populated areas, however, investments in road infrastructure can better meet the transportation requirements of the local population.

                    Moreover, an integrated approach that incorporates roads and railroads is optimal. Creating a well-connected transport network that includes efficient railways and well-maintained roads can provide the advantages of both modes of transport, thereby meeting the diverse requirements of the population.

               In conclusion, the allocation of government funds for transport infrastructure should take into account the capacity, safety, and environmental sustainability advantages of railways, as well as the flexibility and accessibility of roads. A transportation system that meets the requirements of the population will be efficient and comprehensive if it strikes a balance between these two modes of transportation.

Important Vocabulary and Phrases

Transport infrastructure: The physical structures and systems involved in transportation.

Reduce congestion: Alleviate traffic congestion or overcrowding.

Transportation efficiency: The ability to transport people or goods quickly and effectively.

Flexibility and accessibility: The adaptability and ease of access to transportation options.

A well-connected transport network: A comprehensive system that integrates different modes of transportation.

17. Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 

Sample Answer 2

BAND 6.5

                               There is no denying the fact that infrastructure plays a crucial role in the development of a nation. I firmly believe that governments should invest in railways instead of improving roads, as it is cheaper, faster and more environmentally friendly.

                        Indeed, there are numerous upsides to railways. One of the important ones is that railways are the cheapest and the fastest mode of transportation. Unlike roads, people do not get stuck in traffic congestion. Thus, they reach their destinations on time. Furthermore, trains are environmentally friendly, which means they do not produce pollution, compared to vehicles on the roads. For instance, a recent survey has shown that the last 50 years have seen more pollution than the previous 100 years, resulting from the increasing number of vehicles on the roads. In addition to this, a single train can carry tons of goods and hundreds of people, whereas a maximum of 5 people can travel in their private vehicles. Hence, they also reduce accident rates.

                      Despite its numerous benefits, it has some drawbacks. Firstly, they are not convenient for shorter distances, which means it is not possible to lay railway tracks within cities, so roads are convenient for short distances. Moreover, a huge amount of money and time are required for the development of the railways, which may not be possible for the developing nations. Besides, there are some areas where rail networks are not possible. Hilly locations, in particular, are at risk of landslides. Therefore, roads are preferable in such areas. 

                   In conclusion, it seems to me that investment in railways is more advantageous than in roads because they are cheaper, faster, and environmentally friendly.

 274 Words