To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Sample Answer 1
Traffic congestion and pollution have become indisputable problems in contemporary society. Some contend that increasing the price of fuel is the most effective solution, but I partially disagree. Although increasing the price of fuel may have some effect, there are other measures that may be just as or even more effective.
On the one hand, increasing the price of fuel can discourage excessive use of private vehicles, thereby reducing traffic and pollution levels. People may contemplate alternative modes of transportation, such as public transit, cycling, or carpooling, if fuel prices rise. Moreover, the additional revenue generated by higher gasoline prices could be used to improve public transportation infrastructure, thereby encouraging individuals to rely less on private vehicles.
IELTS Speaking
Part-1 Practice
However, increasing gasoline prices alone is not a sufficient solution. First, it could have a disproportionate impact on low-income commuters who rely significantly on private vehicles. This has the potential to exacerbate social inequality. Second, it is essential to consider the accessibility and dependability of alternate modes of transportation. Investing in public transportation systems, enlarging bicycle lanes, and enhancing pedestrian infrastructure should be essential components of any solution. In addition, instituting policies that encourage remote work or flexible working hours could reduce peak-hour traffic volume.
Increasing the price of fuel may have some positive effects on traffic and air pollution, but it should not be the only solution. A comprehensive strategy that invests in alternative modes of transport and promotes flexible work arrangements would be more effective in addressing these issues.
Important phrases and vocabulary:
· Pressing issues: urgent problems
· Traffic congestion: the problem of too many vehicles causing delays and jams
· Pollution levels: the amount of harmful substances in the air, water, or soil
· Excessively: in an extreme or excessive manner
· Public transit: transportation systems that are available for public use, such as buses or trains
· Carpooling: sharing a car with others to reduce individual driving
· Infrastructure: the basic physical structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society
· Social inequality: the unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, or privileges in a society
· Remote work: working from a location outside of a traditional office, often using technology to connect with colleagues
IELTS Speaking
Part-1 Practice
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Sample Answer 2
Band 6.5
Around the globe, there is currently a pervasive problem of traffic congestion and pollution. Cities have higher levels of pollution. This approach, although it has certain advantages, such as reducing traffic congestion and pollution, is not the best option.
Governments may take a number of different measures. Enhancing and expanding public transportation facilities in such a manner that people feel comfortable utilising them would be a sensible approach. It is possible that the city may ban car usage in some sections of the city, such as city centres and places with high traffic, as a second option. Another suggestion concerns the imposition of parking fees. Individuals are compelled to explore other means of transportation, which may be less costly.
Prices are just a stopgap measure and may not reflect the most effective alternative. Customers would face higher food prices as a result of the decrease in car usage. To illustrate, considering the plight of people who live in hilly areas. In such places, road transportation is at the heart of everything. Any rise in the price of gasoline will have a significant effect on the pricing of other goods on the market. Customers may wind up paying more for even a loaf of bread when the market suffers inflation, as a result of which prices fluctuate.
It is preferable to focus on long-term solutions while making decisions. Improved public transportation and investments in alternative fuels are more effective ways to stimulate the economy than raising gasoline costs. To ensure that the general population has access to low-cost public transportation, it is necessary to prohibit the use of automobiles inside city limits.
271 Words
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Sample Answer 3
Band 6.5
There is little room for doubt that the last 50 years have seen more environmental degradation than the previous 200 years. Pollution has indeed become one of the major problems around the globe. The issue of increasing the price of petrol to overcome the traffic and pollution problems is controversial, as there are strong arguments for and against it.
Certainly, there are numerous upsides to increasing the price of fuel. One important benefit is less traffic congestion on roads, which means that people prefer to travel by private vehicle, as they know the increment in prices of petrol, they are aware of their savings. In order to control their expenses, people are more reliant on private vehicles. The second positive is that, when people use public transport, they become healthy because more and more private vehicles on the road pollute the environment, which is unarguably detrimental to the physical, mental and psychological growth of a person. Thus, increasing the price of petrol has now become one of the best ways to overcome the pollution problem.
Despite the advantages, there are other ways to solve traffic and pollution problems. It is true that the price of the product is reliant on the government authorities. If the government increases the prices of private vehicles, it may be beneficial to overcome the problem of traffic congestion. Also, the government should make a policy of using odd and even private vehicles, which are unquestionably advantageous to solve the problem.
To conclude, it seems to me that increasing the price of petrol is essential to solve the grave menace of environmental loss.
268 Words